Rescher begins with a discussion of the nature of philosophy. Given the etymological link of "inquiring" to "asking," his suggestion that philosophical inquiry is a matter of questioning is no cause for concern. But when he goes on to suggest that the task of this inquiry is to answer questions about "the world's scheme of things and our place within it" (p. 1), some practitioners may fear that their specialties -- e.g., aesthetics -- may be left out. Of course if there is some one scheme of everything, the fear may prove unwarranted. Is there?

http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/24711-philosophical-inquiries-an-introduction-to-problems-of-philosophy/

//Given the etymological link of "inquiring" to "asking," his suggestion that philosophical inquiry is a matter of questioning is no cause for concern.//
Если в начале фразы "inquiring" определяется через “asking” то как могло в этой же фразе появиться questioning? Нет, неудачная фраза, ненаучный подход, стиль не выдержан. кстати, автор текста Dennis M. Senchuk, Indiana University (Сенчук – украинский этимологический линк? ) относ. philosophical inquiry, наверное, это так